Saturday, September 15, 2012

My SEO Experiment with the iPhone 5

In case you missed it (and I'm sure you didn't), this week’s biggest tech news was undoubtedly Apple’s announcement of the iPhone 5, and with Week 2 of MKT 595 focused on SEO, I decided to conduct my own SEO experiment to answer the question—what do search results look like for the term “iPhone 5?”

Using search.yahoo.com and google.com to conduct my search, the top organic search results in both instances appeared as follows:




As you'll notice, CNET is #2 on Yahoo! and #1 on Google (following the News Results) with Apple.com nowhere insight other than paid search. In fact, Apple.com does not appear on Page 1 organically until below the scroll. And while I certainly don’t know all of the ins and outs of why Apple.com is so low while CNET is so high, I do have two ideas based on this week’s readings and materials. 

For starters, the file name for CNET’s webpage is cnet.com/iphone-5; this is in stark contrast to apple.com’s URLapple.com/iPhone. And entering the following URLs—apple.com/iPhone5, apple.com/iPhone-5 and apple.com/iPhone_5—all take users to a “Page Not Found” page instead of being redirected to its iPhone page. In my opinion, the lack of the redirects is a huge missed opportunity by Apple.

The second factor that may be contributing to the search results can be found “under the hood” in the coding of each site. While the title and description of apple.com/iphone and cnet.com/iphone-5 both include the word “iPhone 5,” Apple’s website shows no sign of keywords. Meanwhile, CNET’s code appears as follows: <meta name="keywords" content="Apple iPhone 5, Apple iPhone 5 review, Apple iPhone 5 reviews, Smartphones reviews, Smartphones"/>. In fact, the word itself (iPhone 5) is used more than 50 times on the page containing CNET’s review of the device—with plenty of links to other CNET content—and only 20 times on Apple’s website. Given CNET’s prominence within the technology community (as evidenced by the number of comments and social media shares for their iPhone 5 review page) and the number of times iPhone 5 is used, it’s no doubt that it ranks so highly.  

Now, I'm sure there are other factors impacting these search results, and I’m not suggesting that Apple—or its marketing agencies—don’t have a firm handle on their digital presence. Apple's brand is so strong that it doesn't need to be the top result on the page to  sell the iPhone 5. As we know, pre-orders sold out in an hour. Instead, this search test shows the importance of SEO during a product launch. If you're making headlines as a new company or a company who doesn't have Apple's brand recognition, it's important to make sure you have SEO tactics in place to make sure your website ranks towards the top of the page in order to drive traffic to your website.

3 comments:

  1. Very interesting and relevant post!

    I wonder why certain news articles are the first ones to pop up. Does that mean that most people are searching for iPhone news on the independent CNET and Economic Times websites? Or is a multiple organic drill down and google is first displaying their most popular/relevant news websites and then further drilling down to iPhone news? I am not sure if this question can be answered, but your post is making me think -- and that's a good thing.

    Overall, I am still furious that T-Mobile does not have the iPhone yet. I am so tired of my BlackBerry!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I may be wrong on this, Jaclynne, but I believe when Google includes specific News Results or Image Results in addition to the organic search results, that it is pulling the most relevant content and placing it first. For example, if you search for the Chicago Cubs, the first thing you actually get is their recent schedule followed by the organic results. Again, I'm not 100 percent certain, but this is my best guess. And regarding the iPhone and T-Mobile, have you thought about the Samsung Galaxy S III? I've read a ton of reviews that have cited it as a much better phone.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Josh - I enjoyed reading your post, very clever idea to center your post around a relevant and timely search. Well done!

    ReplyDelete